
Wikipedia had an excellent article on Kenkanryu, painstakingly written and compiled by Wikipedia contributor of Manga articles, Ryosuke. The Main Issues section of the article has been hijacked and vandalized by an anonymous anti Japanese user (unfortunately probably Korean). This is how the Main Issues article looked before it was vandalized.
The book covers a variety of Korean-Japanese disputes, including the Liancourt Rocks territorial dispute, Japan’s annexation of Korea, and the Japanese history textbook controversies, with a viewpoint mainly criticizing South Korea and its anti-Japanese attitude. As this book was written in the manga format, seen by many as being friendly and easy to sympathize with, many people who previously had no interest in Korea took the author’s “correct understanding of Korea” on board, so much so that its contents are seen as “truth” rather than opinion to readers with previous anti-Korean sentiments. The book has been widely promoted on anti-Korean websites and on message boards such as 2channel where right-wing opinions are dominant. For example, the website The Other Side of South Korean Soccer They Didn’t Want You To Know (知らされなかった韓国サッカーの“裏側”, Shirasarenakatta Kankoku Sakkā no “Uragawa”), contents from the book (explanations of actual photographs imitated in the manga) are provided as evidence of alleged misjudgment of the South Korean team in the 2002 FIFA World Cup as a result of bribery. In contrast to the Japanese internet, the Japanese media does not have as much of a right-wing presence; the book had been refused publication for two years, and some Japanese newspapers refused to advertise the book. Excerpts from the book have been adopted by famous conservative newspaper columnnists, however, including Kanji Nishio, Kōyū Nishimura, Takahiro Ōtsuki and Masao Shimojō. The book also shows marked influence from the “liberal historical viewpoint” held by the Japanese Society For History Textbook Reform, and the book holds a historical viewpoint common to that of Yoshinori Kobayashi’s Gōmanism series. There have been no attempts yet to debunk the book using written and physical evidence, but a supplementary volume has recently been released entitled The Truth of “Manga – The Hate Korea Wave”! (マンガ嫌韓流の真実!, Manga Kenkanryū no Shinjitsu, ISBN 4796649735, published by Takarajima-sha and released 2005-10-21), using evidence to support its claims that the arguments presented in The Hate Korea Wave are based in fact.
That article is neutral. Compare that to the way it was changed.
“The Hate Korea Wave” portrays Koreans and Chinese as base peoples, advocating confrontation with them. The book says South Korea owes its current success to Japanese colonialism and describes China as the “world’s prostitution superpower”. It reveals some of the sentiments underlying Japan’s current worsening relations with the rest of Asia (see Yasukuni Shrine) as well as the country’s longstanding unease with its own sense of identity. Much of Japan’s history in the last century and a half has been guided by the goal of becoming more like the West and less like Asia and the book, perhaps inadvertently, betrays Japan’s conflicted identity: longstanding feelings of inferiority toward the West and superiority toward the rest of Asia. For example, the Japanese characters in the book are drawn with big eyes, blond hair, and Caucasian features; the Koreans are drawn with black hair, narrow eyes and very Asian features. China and South Korea’s rise to challenge Japan’s position as Asia’s economic, diplomatic and cultural leader has been inspiring renewed xenophobia against them, especially amongst the rising class of unemployed young Japanese. The reality that South Korea had especially emerged as a rival hit many Japanese with full force in 2002, when the countries were co-hosts of soccer’s World Cup and South Korea advanced further than Japan. Television broadcasts from South Korea during the tournament showed that the country had surpassed Japan in some aspects of technology such as mobile phones and high-speed Internet. At the same time, the so-called Korean Wave (television dramas, movies and music from South Korea) swept Japan and the rest of Asia, often displacing Japanese pop cultural exports.
The book covers a variety of Korean-Japanese disputes, including the Liancourt Rocks territorial dispute, Japan’s annexation of Korea, and the Japanese history textbook controversies, with a viewpoint mainly criticizing the Republic of Korea and its perceived anti-Japanese attitude. Through using the manga format, seen by many as being friendly and easy to sympathize with, it was made with the intention to spread widely the author’s “detestable reality of South Korea” to people who had no previous interest in Korea or were unfamiliar with its recent history, with the idea that by doing so would “make as much of a hit as Gōmanism Manifesto did” (said by the author himself). Readers with previous anti-Korean sentiments have taken the author’s “correct understanding of South Korea” on board, so much so that its contents are seen as “truth” rather than opinion to its supporters. The book has been widely promoted on anti-Korean websites, blogs and message boards such as 2channel where right-wing opinions are dominant. The contents come mainly from facts/opinions claimed by critics of South Korea, and there are even cases of inserting content directly from the book by websites criticizing South Korea (many reproducing photographs directly from where they are presented in the book) in the form of supplementing the book’s contents, and also in the form of introducing information raised on the 2channel Hangul Board. For example, the website The Other Side of South Korean Soccer They Didn’t Want You To Know (知らされなかった韓国サッカーの“裏側”, Shirasarenakatta Kankoku Sakkā no “Uragawa”), contents from the book (explanations of actual photographs imitated in the manga) are provided as evidence of alleged misjudgment of the South Korean team in the 2002 FIFA World Cup as a result of bribery.
In contrast to the Japanese internet, the Japanese media does not have as much of a right-wing presence; the book had been refused publication for two years, and some Japanese newspapers refused to advertise the book. Well-known revisionist writers have contributed four written articles to the book, however: Kanji Nishio on the Korean people, Kohyu Nishimura on the South Korean media, Takahiro Ōtsuki on the “Hate Korea Kitchens” (嫌韓厨; Kenkanchū), and Masao Shimojō on the Liancourt Rocks dispute. The book also shows marked influence from the “liberal historical viewpoint” held by the Japanese Society for History Textbook Reform, and the book holds a historical viewpoint common to that of Yoshinori Kobayashi’s Gōmanism Manifesto series (the mentioning of Yoshinori Kobayashi’s name in the article on the ongoing debate over comfort women is also seen as a sign of his influence). There have been no attempts yet to debunk the book using written and physical evidence, but a supplementary volume has recently been released entitled The Truth of “Manga – The Hate Korea Wave”! (マンガ嫌韓流の真実!, Manga Kenkanryū no Shinjitsu, ISBN 4796649735, published by Takarajima-sha and released 2005-10-21), using evidence to support its claims that the arguments presented in The Hate Korea Wave are based in fact.
Let me quickly analyse what is written here. I am not going to analysis too much, because I intend to have the article changed back, but lets set the record straight.
The book says South Korea owes its current success to Japanese colonialism and describes China as the “world’s prostitution superpower.
It mentions that Korea could not have reached its current level of development without the public goods left behind when Japan lost WW2. As for calling China the “world’s prostitution superpower”, it does not. No such sentence exists in The Hate Korea Wave. China and Chinese people are not even a subject in this comic, for that matter.
It reveals some of the sentiments underlying Japan’s current worsening relations with the rest of Asia (see Yasukuni Shrine) as well as the country’s longstanding unease with its own sense of identity.
Uh, it does? No it doesnt.
Much of Japan’s history in the last century and a half has been guided by the goal of becoming more like the West and less like Asia and the book, perhaps inadvertently, betrays Japan’s conflicted identity: longstanding feelings of inferiority toward the West and superiority toward the rest of Asia. For example, the Japanese characters in the book are drawn with big eyes, blond hair, and Caucasian features; the Koreans are drawn with black hair, narrow eyes and very Asian features.
Not true. This is a black and white comic. No character in this comic has blond hair – all characters have either black hair or slightly dyed brown hair, as is popular in Japan. Differences in hair color are designed to assist in telling the characters apart.
China and South Korea’s rise to challenge Japan’s position as Asia’s economic, diplomatic and cultural leader has been inspiring renewed xenophobia against them, especially amongst the rising class of unemployed young Japanese.
More China? The comic has nothing to do with China. As for “renewed xenophobia” being inspired among “unemployed young Japanese”, how about some proof?
The reality that South Korea had especially emerged as a rival hit many Japanese with full force in 2002, when the countries were co-hosts of soccer’s World Cup and South Korea advanced further than Japan. Television broadcasts from South Korea during the tournament showed that the country had surpassed Japan in some aspects of technology such as mobile phones and high-speed Internet. At the same time, the so-called Korean Wave (television dramas, movies and music from South Korea) swept Japan and the rest of Asia, often displacing Japanese pop cultural exports.
Besides being nonsense, why is this in an encyclopedia article about Kenkanryu?
The rest I do not agree with either, because it is more of the same, and I think I made my point above.
While I was writing this, someone else changed (vandalized) Wikipedia’s Kenkanryu article again, possibly in response to my complaint in the talk section of Wikipedia. I am not going to go into the changes because I intend to have it changed back, but go and take a look if you wish.
I think it is 99% likely that a Korean has vandalized this article (who else would care enough?). What I want to say to Koreans that are concerned about issues like this, the East Sea, Dokdo, and other issues is that they should not campaign in a way that disturbs other people. Sending spam emails to foreigners is not the way to convince foreigners that the Dokdo is Korean land, and spamming message boards and Wikipedia changing the name of the Sea of Japan to the East Sea will only annoy foreigners who frankly dont like it that Koreans think they have the right to decide what the Sea of Japan is called in English. I know that Koreans want foreigners to believe their point of view but really, Koreans are their own worst enemy. Korean strategies for convincing foreigners usually annoy and upset them. Imagine a student doing a geography report checking Wikipedia and finding that the Sea of Japan is listed as the ‘East Sea’, and submitting a report about the ‘East Sea’ to the teacher. The student will fail. This is not the way for Koreans to convince foreigners.
I understand that Koreans feel strongly about certain issues, but when it comes to the English language, the English version of Wikipedia and anything else in our language, please, leave us alone. Write whatever you want in the Korean version of Wikipedia. We want accurate information that isnt influenced by Korean nationalism, irredentism, or other Korean issues.
Some foreigners will probably be fooled by the false information contained within the Main Issues section of the Wikipedia article, but the joke will be on the Koreans that changed it because foreigners will become angry when they realise that they have been decieved. Koreans trying to be patriotic usually make people anti Korean, not pro Korean.
My advice to Koreans wanting to convince foreigners is to calm down and relax.
Recent Comments